Abstract
This article examines the scope and meaning of ‘sexual harm’ within the context of ancillary sentencing orders in England and Wales. It argues that the statutory definition provided in the Sexual Offences Act 2003, recently replicated in the Sentencing Act 2020, does not extend to the transmission of sexually communicable infections and that, subsequently, it is inappropriate for Sexual Harm Prevention Orders to be imposed with the aim of preventing transmissions of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). It suggests that recent case law reinforces this point and that the questions this raises reflect the broader need for further scrutiny of the aims and purposes of sentencing, and criminalisation more generally, in instances of STI transmission.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 209-222 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | The Journal of Criminal Law |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 8 Feb 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Sexual Behaviour
- Pt 2 Sexual Offences Act 2003
- Sexual Harm Prevention Orders
- Sexually Transmitted Infections
- Sentencing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Sexual Harm? HIV Transmission, ‘Biological’ GBH and Ancillary Sentencing Provisions in England and Wales'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver