Abstract
Three experiments are reported in which the strategy usage for a compass point directions task was
investigated. For this task, people may use either an efficient cancellation strategy or an inefficient
spatial strategy (see Roberts, Gilmore, & Wood, 1997). Experiment 1, together with Experiment 2,
showed that users of cancellation are unlikely to have explicit prior knowledge of this strategy; instead
they discover it as a result of experience with the task. Experiment 1 also showed that strategy selec?tion is unlikely to be based on stylistic preferences, and that reducing the cognitive demands of the task
does not increase the discovery of cancellation. Experiment 3 showed that evaluation of strategy va?lidity is also of importance: Unsuccessful evaluation may prevent the selection of a newly discovered
strategy, even if it is the more efficient method
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 565-573 |
Journal | Memory & Cognition |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2000 |