Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Association between critical care admission and 6-month functional outcome after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage

  • CROMIS-2 Collaborators
  • , Siobhan Mc Lernon
  • , Ghil Schwarz
  • , Duncan Wilson
  • , Gareth Ambler
  • , Russell Goodwin
  • , Clare Shakeshaft
  • , Hannah Cohen
  • , Tarek Yousry
  • , Rustam Al Shahi Salman
  • , Gregory Y.H. Lip
  • , Henry Houlden
  • , Martin M. Brown
  • , Keith W. Muir
  • , Hans Rolf Jäger
  • , Louise Terry
  • , David J. Werring
  • University College London
  • Cornea and Ocular Surface Disease Unit, Eye Repair Lab, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute
  • London South Bank University
  • University of Edinburgh
  • University of Liverpool
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Glasgow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is uncertainty about the clinical benefit of admission to critical care after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). Purpose: We investigated factors associated with critical care admission after spontaneous ICH and evaluated associations between critical care and 6-month functional outcome. Methods: We included 825 patients with acute spontaneous non-traumatic ICH, recruited to a prospective multicenter observational study. We evaluated the characteristics associated with critical care admission and poor 6-month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS > 3) using univariable (chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, as appropriate) and multivariable analysis. Results: 286 patients (38.2%) had poor 6-month functional outcome. Seventy-seven (9.3%) patients were admitted to critical care. Patients admitted to critical care were younger (p < 0.001), had lower GCS score (p < 0.001), larger ICH volume (p < 0.001), more often had intraventricular extension (p = 0.008) and underwent neurosurgery (p < 0.001). Critical care admission was associated with poor functional outcome at 6 months (39/77 [50.7%] vs 286/748 [38.2%]; p = 0.034); adjusted OR 2.43 [95%CI 1.36–4.35], p = 0.003), but not with death (OR 1.29 [95%CI 0.71–2.35; p = 0.4). In ordinal logistic regression, patients admitted to critical care showed an OR 1.47 (95% CI 0.98–2.20; p = 0.07) for a shift in the 6-month modified Rankin Scale. Conclusions: Admission to critical care is associated with poor 6-month functional outcome after spontaneous ICH but not with death. Patients admitted to critical care were a priori more severely affected. Although adjusted for main known predictors of poor outcome, our findings could still be confounded by unmeasured factors. Establishing the true effectiveness of critical care after ICH requires a randomised trial with clinical outcomes and quality of life assessments.

Original languageEnglish
Article number117141
JournalJournal of the Neurological Sciences
Volume418
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Nov 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.

Keywords

  • Spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage
  • Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) functional outcome
  • Intensive care
  • Critical Care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association between critical care admission and 6-month functional outcome after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this