Before ‘Rock Bottom’? Problem framing effects on stigma and change among harmful drinkers

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Under the disease model of alcoholism, ‘rock bottom’ represents the point at which problem drinkers hit a low, after which denial is overcome and recovery begins. More specifically, the brain disease model of alcoholism implies those with the disease have a distinct pathology. However, a far broader population of drinkers experience harm without conforming to alcoholism stereotypes, reflecting a broader continuum of alcohol harms. The false binary created by an alcoholism/brain disease model allows harmful drinkers to distinguish their own ‘responsible’ use from the stereotyped/pathologized alcoholic other. This drives stigma via processes of separation and difference, raising the threshold for problem recognition. While attributing problem drinking to a disease may reduce blame toward the individual, evidence shows that blame is an insufficient measure of stigma and may come at the cost of increased
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEvaluating the Brain Disease Model of Addiction
PublisherRoutledge
Number of pages572
Edition1st Edition
Publication statusPublished - 7 Mar 2022

Keywords

  • Alcohol, alcoholism, stigma, brain disease model of addiction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Before ‘Rock Bottom’? Problem framing effects on stigma and change among harmful drinkers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this