TY - JOUR
T1 - Best practices in clinical ethics consultation and decision-making
AU - Terry, Louise M.
AU - Sanders, Karen
PY - 2011/3
Y1 - 2011/3
N2 - The conference entitled 'Best Practices in Clinical Ethics Consultation and Decision-Making', held in London 8 - 9 July 2010, was the first of its kind dedicated to identifying best practices in clinical ethics consultation and decision-making. Academics, health and social care professionals, clinical ethics committee members, lawyers, service users and carers from the UK, USA, Europe, Canada, Australia and Asia attended lectures, workshops, parallel paper sessions and clinical ethics case discussions across adult, maternity, children's, older persons, mental health and learning disabilities settings. Seventy-eight bestpractice points impacting on the quality of clinical ethics consultations and subsequent decisions were identified and grouped into eight themes: who tells the story; how the story is told; how the analysis, discussion and subsequent decisions are made; how values are weighted and balanced against one another; who decides; how the decision is made; how group dynamics and conflict are handled; how decisions are recorded.
AB - The conference entitled 'Best Practices in Clinical Ethics Consultation and Decision-Making', held in London 8 - 9 July 2010, was the first of its kind dedicated to identifying best practices in clinical ethics consultation and decision-making. Academics, health and social care professionals, clinical ethics committee members, lawyers, service users and carers from the UK, USA, Europe, Canada, Australia and Asia attended lectures, workshops, parallel paper sessions and clinical ethics case discussions across adult, maternity, children's, older persons, mental health and learning disabilities settings. Seventy-eight bestpractice points impacting on the quality of clinical ethics consultations and subsequent decisions were identified and grouped into eight themes: who tells the story; how the story is told; how the analysis, discussion and subsequent decisions are made; how values are weighted and balanced against one another; who decides; how the decision is made; how group dynamics and conflict are handled; how decisions are recorded.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860203883&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1258/ce.2011.011009
DO - 10.1258/ce.2011.011009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84860203883
SN - 1477-7509
VL - 6
SP - 103
EP - 108
JO - Clinical Ethics
JF - Clinical Ethics
IS - 2
ER -