Abstract
Aims: To understand the current capacity and capability for nursing, midwifery and allied health professional (NMAHP) principal investigator roles in England. Design: Quantitative online survey. Methods: Online national quantitative survey across England analysed using descriptive statistics. Results: The number of NMAHP PIs in an organisation was unrelated to the size of the NMAHP workforce. NMAHP PIs were more common in non-CTIMP studies. A quarter of organisations had no specific education or support for NMAHP PIs. Most respondents indicated that a national approach to support and training would be helpful. Conclusions: Having more research-active NMAHPs provides career progression, improved staff retention and improves the evidence base for practice. Having a broader range of CI/PIs allows for more targeted and specialty-specific oversight of research studies and streamlines the acceptance process to allow research to be delivered in a more timely manner. Implications for Practice: This will require more collaboration between NMAHP, medical and industry communities to promote a multidisciplinary approach to healthcare research delivery and to ensure that CI/PI roles are fulfilled by the most appropriate person, regardless of their profession. Impact: To ascertain NMAHP capacity and capability for PI research roles. Shows where national and organisational effort should be focused to increase this nationally. Reporting Method: Cross reporting guidance for survey studies was utilised. Patient Contribution: No patient or patient contribution.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Clinical Nursing |
Early online date | 9 Jan 2025 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 9 Jan 2025 |
Keywords
- allied health professionals
- clinical research
- midwives
- nurses
- principal investigator