Abstract
Despite a tremendous amount of research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the management field, previous literature does not offer a clear typology of CSR strategy beyond a simple distinction of more vs. less investment and reactive vs. proactive posture. We develop a typology of CSR strategy upon two strategic considerations around a particular social issue: issue legitimacy and potential for competitive advantage. We highlight an overlooked fact about an inconsistency in legitimating a social issue, presenting conflicts or temporal gaps at various levels. Firms also consider whether an issue can be integrated into core business operations to enhance competitive advantage. Combining these two dimensions, we propose four types of CSR strategy in the typology and explain each.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - 27 May 2019 |
Event | The 47th Annual Meeting of the Administrative Science Association of Canada (ASAC) - Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada Duration: 24 May 2019 → 27 May 2019 |
Conference
Conference | The 47th Annual Meeting of the Administrative Science Association of Canada (ASAC) |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Canada |
City | St. Catharines |
Period | 24/05/19 → 27/05/19 |
Keywords
- Sensible business
- Symbolic CSR
- Legitimacy inconsistency
- Competitive advantage
- Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
- CSR strategy