Categorizing Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy: A Perspective of Legitimacy Management

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Despite a tremendous amount of research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the management field, previous literature does not offer a clear typology of CSR strategy beyond a simple distinction of more vs. less investment and reactive vs. proactive posture. We develop a typology of CSR strategy upon two strategic considerations around a particular social issue: issue legitimacy and potential for competitive advantage. We highlight an overlooked fact about an inconsistency in legitimating a social issue, presenting conflicts or temporal gaps at various levels. Firms also consider whether an issue can be integrated into core business operations to enhance competitive advantage. Combining these two dimensions, we propose four types of CSR strategy in the typology and explain each.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 27 May 2019
EventThe 47th Annual Meeting of the Administrative Science Association of Canada (ASAC) - Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada
Duration: 24 May 201927 May 2019

Conference

ConferenceThe 47th Annual Meeting of the Administrative Science Association of Canada (ASAC)
Country/TerritoryCanada
CitySt. Catharines
Period24/05/1927/05/19

Keywords

  • Sensible business
  • Symbolic CSR
  • Legitimacy inconsistency
  • Competitive advantage
  • Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
  • CSR strategy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Categorizing Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy: A Perspective of Legitimacy Management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this