Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Collective Consent to Xenotransplantation: A Critical Appraisal

  • Christopher Bobier
  • , Adam Omelianchuk
  • , Daniel Rodger
  • , Daniel J Hurst
  • Foundational Sciences Department, Central Michigan University, College of Medicine , Mt. Pleasant, MI ,, USA
  • Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine , Houston, TX ,, USA
  • Operating Department Practice, School of Allied and Community Health, London South Bank University , London , , UK
  • Department of Family Medicine Rowan‐Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine Stratford New Jersey USA

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Solid organ xenotransplantation may have the potential to help address the shortage of organs for transplantation. There is concern, however, that a novel zoonotic disease could be transmitted from the source organ to the human recipient, and then from the recipient to others. Theoretically, this could result in an epidemic or pandemic. Because of this potential risk, it has been argued that collective consent is required. Our goal is to critically evaluate the claim that collective consent is necessary for xenotransplantation to be ethically permissible. We argue that collective consent is not required and highlight the important roles of public engagement and due diligence in xenotransplant research moving forward.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberphae011
JournalPublic Health Ethics
Volume18
Issue number1
Early online date12 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jan 2025
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Cite this