Abstract
Despite all the differences offered in theories of utility formation and decisions from experience/ descriptions, they share common assumption – decision makers have stable and coherent preferences, informed by consistent use of psychological strategy/processing (computational or sampling) that guide their choices between alternatives varying in risk and reward. In contrast, we argue for the non-existence of stable risk preferences; we propose that risk preferences are constructed dynamically based on strategy selection as a reinforcement-learning model. Accordingly, we found that decision context and associative learning predict strategy selection and govern risky preferences; rather having fixed preferences for risk, people select decision strategies from current context and learn to select decision strategies that are most successful (in terms of effort and reward) for a given context.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 19 Nov 2015 |
| Event | 49th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society - The Hilton Chicago, Chicago, United States Duration: 13 Nov 2008 → 15 Nov 2008 |
Conference
| Conference | 49th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Chicago |
| Period | 13/11/08 → 15/11/08 |