Abstract
Software fault prediction (SFP) is a quality assurance process that identifies if certain modules are faultprone (FP) or not-fault-prone (NFP). Hence, it minimizes the testing efforts incurred in terms of cost and time. Supervised machine learning techniques have capacity to spot-out the FP
modules. However, such techniques require fault information
from previous versions of software product. Such information,
accumulated over the life-cycle of software, may neither be
readily available nor reliable. Currently, clustering with experts’
opinions is a prudent choice for labeling the modules without any
fault information. However, the asserted technique may not fully
comprehend important aspects such as selection of experts, conflict in expert opinions, catering the diverse expertise of domain
experts etc. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive framework
namedEkmEx that extends the conventional fault prediction
approaches while providing mathematical foundation through
aspects not addressed so far. The EkmEx guides in selection
of experts, furnishes an objective solution for resolve of verdictconflicts and manages the problem of diversity in expertise of domain experts. We performed expert-assisted module labeling through EkmEx and conventional clustering on seven public datasets of NASA. The empirical outcomes of research exhibit significant potential of the proposed framework in identifying FP modules across all seven datasets
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 12141-12156 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Multimedia Tools and Applications |
Volume | 81 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 8 Jan 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Keywords
- Expert opinion
- Labeling datasets
- Software fault proneness
- Software metrics