Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Embedding shared decision-making in the care of patients with severe and enduring mental health problems: The EQUIP pragmatic cluster randomised trial

  • Karina Lovell
  • , Penny Bee
  • , Helen Brooks
  • , Patrick Cahoon
  • , Patrick Callaghan
  • , Lesley Anne Carter
  • , Lindsey Cree
  • , Linda Davies
  • , Richard Drake
  • , Claire Fraser
  • , Chris Gibbons
  • , Andrew Grundy
  • , Kathryn Hinsliff-Smith
  • , Oonagh Meade
  • , Chris Roberts
  • , Anne Rogers
  • , Kelly Rushton
  • , Caroline Sanders
  • , Gemma Shields
  • , Lauren Walker
  • Peter Bower
  • University of Manchester
  • Greater Manchester West Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Liverpool
  • University of Cambridge
  • School of Health Sciences
  • University of Nottingham
  • University of Galway
  • University of Southampton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe mental illness is a major driver of worldwide disease burden. Shared decision-making is critical for high quality care, and can enhance patient satisfaction and outcomes. However, it has not been translated into routine practice. This reflects a lack of evidence on the best way to implement shared decision-making, and the challenges of implementation in routine settings with limited resources. Our aim was to test whether we could deliver a practical and feasible intervention in routine community mental health services to embed shared decision-making for patients with severe mental illness, by improving patient and carer involvement in care planning. METHODS: We cluster randomised community mental health teams to the training intervention or usual care, to avoid contamination. Training was co-delivered to a total of 350 staff in 18 teams by clinical academics, working alongside patients and carers. The primary outcome was the Health Care Climate Questionnaire, a self-report measure of 'autonomy support'. Primary and secondary outcomes were collected by self-report, six months after allocation. FINDINGS: In total, 604 patients and 90 carers were recruited to main trial cohort. Retention at six months was 82% (n = 497). In the main analysis, results showed no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome between the intervention and usual care at 6 months (adjusted mean difference -0.064, 95% CI -0.343 to 0.215, p = 0.654). We found significant effects on only 1 secondary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: An intervention to embed shared decision-making in routine practice by improving involvement in care planning was well attended and acceptable to staff, but had no significant effects on patient outcomes. Enhancing shared decision-making may require considerably greater investment of resources and effects may only be apparent over the longer term.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0201533
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume13
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Aug 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Lovell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • General Science & Technology
  • MD Multidisciplinary

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Embedding shared decision-making in the care of patients with severe and enduring mental health problems: The EQUIP pragmatic cluster randomised trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this