Negotiating stairs with an inconsistent riser: Implications for stepping safety

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2020 Elsevier Ltd Stairs are associated with falls, especially when step dimensions are inconsistent. However, the mechanisms by which inconsistencies cause this higher risk are mostly theoretical. In this experimental study we quantified the effect of inconsistent rise heights on biomechanical measurements of stepping safety from younger (n = 26) and older adults (n = 33). In ascent, both groups decreased foot clearance (~9 mm) over the inconsistently higher step (F(1,56) = 48.4, p < 0.001). In descent, they reduced foot contact length on the higher step by 3% (F(1,56) = 9.1, p < 0.01). Reduced clearance may result in a toe-catch potentially leading to a trip, while reduced foot contact lengths increase the risk of overstepping which may also lead to a fall. These effects occurred because participants did not alter their foot trajectories, indicating they either did not detect or were not able to adjust to the inconsistent rise, increasing the likelihood of a fall. Consistent stair construction is vital, and existing inconsistencies should be identified and safety interventions developed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103131-103131
JournalApplied Ergonomics
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2020

Keywords

  • Fall risk
  • Variable dimensions
  • Step geometry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Negotiating stairs with an inconsistent riser: Implications for stepping safety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this