Plastic Buckling Paradox: An Updated Review

Rabee Shamass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is widely accepted that the flow theory of plasticity significantly overestimates buckling stresses and strains and, in some cases, fails to predict buckling at all, while the deformation theory, which lacks physical rigor compared to the flow theory, predicts results that are in better agreement with experimental ones. The deformation theory is therefore recommended for use in practical applications of the buckling of shells. This paper aims to review in detail the causes behind the seeming discrepancies in the results predicted by both the flow and deformation theories of plasticity, and to propose an explanation for this so-called “plastic buckling paradox” on the basis of some recent research work in the field.
Original languageEnglish
JournalFrontiers in Built Environment
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Apr 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Plastic buckling paradox
  • Deformation theory
  • Plasticity
  • Flow theory, , , ,
  • Buckling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Plastic Buckling Paradox: An Updated Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this