Regularities and discrepancies of credit default swaps: a data science approach through Benford's law

Roy Cerqueti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we search whether the Benford’s law is applicable to monitor daily changes in sovereign credit default swaps (CDS) quotes, which are acknowledged to be complex systems of economic content. This test is of paramount importance since the CDS of a country proxy its health and probability to default, being associated to an insurance against the event of its default. We fit the Benford’s law to the daily changes in sovereign CDS spreads for 13 European countries – both inside and outside the European Union and European Monetary Union. Two different tenors for the sovereign CDS contracts are considered: 5 years and 10 years – the former being the reference and most liquid one. The time period under investigation is 2008–2015 which includes the period of distress caused by the European sovereign debt crisis. Moreover, (i) an analysis over relevant sub-periods is carried out; (ii) several insights are also provided by implementing the tracking of the Benford’s law over moving windows. The main test for checking the conformance to Benford’s law is – as usual – the χ2 test, whose values are presented and discussed for all cases. The analysis is further completed by elaborations based on Chebyshev’s distance and Kullback and Leibler’s divergence. The results highlight differences by countries and tenors. In particular, these results suggest that liquidity seems to be associated to higher levels of distortion. Greece – representing a peculiar case – shows a very different path with respect to the other European countries
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-17
JournalChaos, Solitons and Fractals
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regularities and discrepancies of credit default swaps: a data science approach through Benford's law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this