Abstract
In one experiment we studied the extent to which theories of judgment, decision-making and memory can predict people's preferences. Applying Prospect Theory and Support Theory to these data we find that (a) the weighting function required to model decisions with 'high-accessible' features in memory exhibits different properties to those required to model choices between monetary gambles and (b) the accessibility (Fox & Levav, 2000; Kahneman, 2003; Koriat, 2001) of events in memory affects choices between options, influencing participants' decision weights, but not their judgments of these options.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 21 Aug 2011 |
| Event | 23rd Bi-Annual Conference on Subjective Probability, Utility and Decision Making - Duration: 21 Aug 2011 → … |
Conference
| Conference | 23rd Bi-Annual Conference on Subjective Probability, Utility and Decision Making |
|---|---|
| Period | 21/08/11 → … |