Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Should Xenotransplantation Surgeries Be Authorized Under the Food and Drug Administration's Expanded Access Pathway?

  • Associate professor at Central Michigan University College of Medicine in Mount Pleasant, Michigan.
  • Associate professor and the director of medical professionalism, ethics, and humanities at Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine in Stratford, New Jersey.
  • Senior lecturer of operating department practice at London South Bank University in England.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines use of the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) expanded access pathway to permit cardiac xenotransplants. This article first argues that, although data are collected from cardiac xenotransplant surgeries authorized through the FDA's expanded access pathway, uses of preclinical trial data do not align with the FDA's stated aims of expanded access. This article also argues that potential risks of xenotransplantation merit greater caution than risks posed by devices and that it is unclear how caution about such risks is regarded and operationalized during the FDA's expanded access authorization processes. [Abstract copyright: Copyright 2025 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.]
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-200
Number of pages4
JournalAMA journal of ethics
Volume27
Issue number3
Early online date1 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2025
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2025 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

Keywords

  • Humans
  • United States Food and Drug Administration
  • Heart Transplantation
  • United States
  • Transplantation, Heterologous - legislation & jurisprudence - ethics
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Animals

Cite this