Abstract
This article examines use of the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) expanded access pathway to permit cardiac xenotransplants. This article first argues that, although data are collected from cardiac xenotransplant surgeries authorized through the FDA's expanded access pathway, uses of preclinical trial data do not align with the FDA's stated aims of expanded access. This article also argues that potential risks of xenotransplantation merit greater caution than risks posed by devices and that it is unclear how caution about such risks is regarded and operationalized during the FDA's expanded access authorization processes. [Abstract copyright: Copyright 2025 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.]
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | E197-E200 |
| Journal | AMA journal of ethics |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 1 Mar 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Copyright 2025 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
Keywords
- Humans
- United States Food and Drug Administration
- Heart Transplantation
- United States
- Transplantation, Heterologous - legislation & jurisprudence - ethics
- Health Services Accessibility
- Animals