Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Smoking cessation for people accessing homeless support centres (SCeTCH): comparing the provision of an E-cigarette versus Usual Care in a cluster randomised controlled trial in Great Britain

  • Lynne Dawkins
  • , Kirstie Soar
  • , Francesca Pesola
  • , Allison Ford
  • , Caitlin Notley
  • , Rachel Brown
  • , Emma Ward
  • , Lauren McMillan
  • , Deborah Robson
  • , Anna Varley
  • , Charlotte Mair
  • , Jessica Lennon
  • , janine brierley
  • , Amy Edwards
  • , Peter Hajek
  • , Allan Tyler
  • , Steve Parrott
  • , Jinshuo Li
  • , Linda Bauld
  • , Bethany Gardner
  • Sharon Cox
  • Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London
  • Institute for Social Marketing and Health University of Stirling Stirling UK
  • Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
  • Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University
  • King's College London
  • University of York
  • Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh
  • Tobacco and Alcohol Research Group University College London London UK

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Smoking rates are exceptionally high among people experiencing homelessness. We aimed to test the effectiveness of an e-cigarette (EC) intervention designed to help people accessing homeless support services to stop smoking. Methods: A two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. We recruited 32 homeless centres (clusters) across Great Britain. Participants were aged 18 + and known by centre staff to smoke. Randomisation of clusters (1:1; using various block sizes) to EC or usual care (UC) was generated in Stata by the trial statistician, concealed from researchers. Participants in EC clusters received a refillable EC, 4-week supply of e-liquid, and a fact sheet. UC participants received very brief advice on smoking, a support leaflet, and signposting to the stop smoking service. Interventions were delivered by centre staff. The primary outcome was sustained abstinence from smoking from 2 weeks post-baseline through to 24 weeks, verified by carbon monoxide (CO) measurements below 8 ppm. Secondary outcomes included CO-verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Results: Between February 22, 2022, and June 22, 2023, 16 centres were randomised to EC (n = 239 participants) and 16 to UC (n = 238 participants). In UC, one participant died, and one withdrew consent. Final sample analysed: n = 239 (EC); n = 236 (UC). Sustained 24-week CO-validated smoking cessation rates were 5/239 (2.1%) with EC vs. 2/236 (0.8%) with UC (aRR: 2.43, 95%CI: 0.51–11.64). Seven-point prevalence abstinence was 15/239 (6.3%) in the EC arm vs. 5/236 (2.1%) in UC (aRR: 2.95, 95%CI: 1.05–8.29). Four adverse events were reported in the EC arm; three deemed EC-related and not serious; one serious and not EC-related. Conclusions: EC did not support sustained smoking abstinence for 24 weeks. Seven-day point prevalence abstinence rates suggest that cessation is possible, but more support may be needed to sustain this. Trial registration: The trial was preregistered on the ISTCTN registry #18566874. Registration date: 12/10/2021.

Original languageEnglish
Article number394
JournalBMC Medicine
Volume23
Issue number1
Early online date1 Jul 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2025

Keywords

  • smoking cessation
  • smoking reduction
  • homelessness
  • e-cigarettes
  • tobacco harm reduction
  • health inequalities
  • abstinence
  • cluster randomised controlled trial

Cite this