Strategic interviewing to elicit admissions: Making guilty suspects more forthcoming

Research output: Contribution to conferencepresentation

Abstract

The current study aimed to alter the counter-interrogation strategies of guilty suspects by influencing their perception of the evidence with the goal of eliciting admissions. Participants (N = 90) were asked to perform several mock criminal tasks before being interviewed using one of three interview techniques: (1) Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) (2) Early Disclosure of Evidence; or (3) A Control interview. Suspects in the SUE condition (vs. other conditions) (1) had more statement-evidence inconsistencies, (2) disclosed more admissions, and (3) perceived the interviewer to have had more information than s/he actually did.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 5 Mar 2015
Event2015 American Psychology-Law Society Annual Meeting -
Duration: 3 May 2015 → …

Conference

Conference2015 American Psychology-Law Society Annual Meeting
Period3/05/15 → …

Keywords

  • strategic interviewing, admissions, counter-interrogation strategies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Strategic interviewing to elicit admissions: Making guilty suspects more forthcoming'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this