Abstract
The current study aimed to alter the counter-interrogation strategies of guilty suspects by
influencing their perception of the evidence with the goal of eliciting admissions. Participants (N
= 90) were asked to perform several mock criminal tasks before being interviewed using one of
three interview techniques: (1) Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) (2) Early Disclosure of
Evidence; or (3) A Control interview. Suspects in the SUE condition (vs. other conditions) (1)
had more statement-evidence inconsistencies, (2) disclosed more admissions, and (3) perceived
the interviewer to have had more information than s/he actually did.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - 5 Mar 2015 |
Event | 2015 American Psychology-Law Society Annual Meeting - Duration: 3 May 2015 → … |
Conference
Conference | 2015 American Psychology-Law Society Annual Meeting |
---|---|
Period | 3/05/15 → … |
Keywords
- strategic interviewing, admissions, counter-interrogation strategies