Abstract
The Nigerian civil war and Biafra’s failed attempt to secede from Nigeria raised a series of questions about the nature and scope of the right to self-determination in formerly colonised states. The question which this paper focuses on is whether the right to self-determination should always amount to a right to secession. Through a critical analysis of Biafran agitations for statehood during the Nigerian civil war and in recent times, this paper makes the case for a framework through which self-determination claims can be addressed within existing territorial arrangements. The paper argues that, in the case of Biafra, forms of internal self-determination such as autonomy may address the agitations and needs of the people better than secession. Hence, international lawyers, and the international community as a whole, should give more attention to internal forms of self-determination.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 104-130 |
Journal | African Journal of International and Comparative Law |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2023 |
Keywords
- IPOB
- Biafra
- Autonomy
- Nigerian civil war
- Self-Determination