The case for compulsory surgical smoke evacuation systems in the operating theatre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Perioperative staff are frequently exposed to surgical smoke created by using heat-generating devices like diathermy and lasers. This is a concern due to mounting evidence that this exposure can be harmful with no safe level of exposure yet identified. First, I briefly summarise the problem posed by surgical smoke exposure and highlight that many healthcare organisations are not sufficiently satisfying their legal and ethical responsibilities to protect their staff from potential harm. Second, I explore the ethical case for compulsory smoke evacuation systems using the principlist framework and its four ethical principles-autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. I then consider some objections and argue that surgical smoke evacuation systems-when indicated-should be made compulsory.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)130-135
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Ethics
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Nov 2021

Keywords

  • Surgical smoke, Ethics, Autonomy, Beneficence, Justice, Patient Safety, Healthcare, Perioperative, Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The case for compulsory surgical smoke evacuation systems in the operating theatre'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this