The rhetorics of ‘agile’ and the practices of ‘agile working’: Consequences for the worker experience and uncertain implications for HR practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The various rhetorics of ‘agile’, ‘agility’, and ‘agile working’ (AW) set an agenda for new ways of working and have gained traction in popular management discourse recently, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet conceptually, these varieties are underdeveloped in the academic literature. In this article we examine the stream of AW by first locating separate streams and rhetorics of ‘agile’ in the literature, each seemingly unaware of each other, and then situating AW within this typology to show its distinctiveness from other streams of ‘agile’. To understand a particular version of reality being mainstreamed by the AW rhetoric, we then examine its conceptualisation as a new way of working, as promoted by dominant actors within the UK work context. We then consider existing studies of worker experiences under different employment arrangements that can be subsumed under the heading of ‘AW practices’. Our analysis highlights voids between what may be considered as mainstream HR practices when applied to standard employees compared to a spectrum of ‘non-standard’ workers. The implications for the role of HR in the implementation of AW and in managing the worker experience are discussed and future avenues for this under-researched area are offered.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4440-4467
Number of pages28
JournalThe International Journal of Human Resource Management
Volume33
Issue number22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jul 2022

Keywords

  • AW, temporary workers, fixed-term workers, agency workers, zero-hours workers, freelancers, HRM

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The rhetorics of ‘agile’ and the practices of ‘agile working’: Consequences for the worker experience and uncertain implications for HR practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this