Abstract
Utility scores are integral to health economics decision-making. Typically, utility scores have not been scored or developed with mental health service users. The aims of this study were to i) collaborate with service users to develop descriptions of five mental health states (psychosis, depression, eating disorder, medication side effects and self-harm); ii) explore feasibility and acceptability of using scenario-based health states in an e-survey; iii) evaluate which utility measures (standard gamble (SG), time trade off (TTO) and rating scale (RS)) are preferred; and iv) determine how different participant groups discriminate between the health scenarios and rank them.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e0205223 |
| Journal | PLoS ONE |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 23 Oct 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
- Young Adult
- Psychotic Disorders
- Mentally Ill Persons
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Feeding and Eating Disorders
- Caregivers
- United Kingdom
- Aged
- Feasibility Studies
- Adult
- Cross-Sectional Studies
- Middle Aged
- Decision Making
- Female
- Health Personnel
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Decision Support Techniques
- Male
- Depression
- Mental Health Services
- Self-Injurious Behavior
- Service User and Carer Group Advising on Research (SUGAR) members
- Humans
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver