Worldview Literacy as Educational Praxis: A Response to 'Religious Literacy': Some Considerations and Reservations', Johannes C. Wolfart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This response picks up on two key themes identified by Wolfhart: That of the contested aims of "religious literacy"and the lack of an evidence base for its efficacy. Focusing on the context of formal schooling, the idea of "worldview literacy"is presented as an alternative to "religious literacy". Rather than an outcome of education, "worldview literacy"is presented as a process of encounter in plurality, an educational praxis that brings young people to a greater understanding of the dynamic diversity of worldviews and of themselves as social actors therein. This reconciles what are often seen as competing aims of Religious Education and provides a framework for a more distributed worldviews education. It is suggested that amidst a preoccupation with measurement, attention needs to be refocused on the value of the educational process itself.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalMethod & Theory in the Study of Religion
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jun 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Copyright 2022 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Keywords

  • Worldview literacy, religious education, praxis, transformative education.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Worldview Literacy as Educational Praxis: A Response to 'Religious Literacy': Some Considerations and Reservations', Johannes C. Wolfart'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this