Xenograft recipients and the right to withdraw from a clinical trial

Christopher Bobier, Daniel Rodger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Preclinical xenotransplantation research using genetically engineered pigs has begun to show some promising results and could one day offer a scalable means of addressing organ shortage. While it is a fundamental tenet of ethical human subject research that participants have a right to withdraw from research once enrolled, several scholars have argued that the right to withdraw from xenotransplant research should be suspended because of the public health risks posed by xenozoonotic transmission. Here, we present a comprehensive critical evaluation of the claim that xenotransplant recipients should be required to waive their right to withdraw from lifelong biosurveillance. We conclude that if xenotransplantation requires participants to waive their right to withdraw, then clinical trials may not be justifiable, given the ethical and legal obstacles involved with doing so. Consequently, if clinical trials are permitted with a right to withdraw, then they may pose a significant public health risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)308-315
Number of pages8
JournalBioethics
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • Xenotransplantation
  • Infectious disease
  • Public health
  • Informed consent
  • Clinical trials
  • Risk
  • Xenozoonosis
  • Biotechnology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Xenograft recipients and the right to withdraw from a clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this