Abstract
Xenotransplant patient selection recommendations restrict clinical trial participation to seriously ill patients for whom alternative therapies are unavailable or who will likely die while waiting for an allotransplant. Despite a scholarly consensus that this is advisable, we propose to examine this restriction. We offer three lines of criticism: (1) The risk-benefit calculation may well be unfavorable for seriously ill patients and society; (2) the guidelines conflict with criteria for equitable patient selection; and (3) the selection of seriously ill patients may compromise informed consent. We conclude by highlighting how the current guidance reveals a tension between the societal values of justice and beneficence.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 5 Oct 2023 |
Keywords
- allotransplantation
- justice
- research subjects
- consent
- ethics
- clinical trial
- equity
- xenotransplantation
- fairness